The Great White Hope

“The way I see it, if we don’t all march in step, if we don’t do as we’re told,
if we don’t follow our leaders blindly, there’s no hope of saving our freedom.”
   Major Frank Burns in M*A*S*H

*   *   *   *   *   *   *

Presidential candidate Donald J. Trump, in 2016, famously proclaimed, “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose voters.”  Over subsequent years, Trump’s voluminous pronouncements, screeds, and lies leave many convinced his thinking, indeed his grasp on reality, cry out for serious scrutiny.  Nevertheless, “I wouldn’t lose voters” proves prescient.  Donald’s current tally of supporters is little changed from the day of that astonishing assertion.  Why?

Each of us needs resources which seem best to serve and protect our needs.  A well-defined cohort ameliorates this need.  Globally over human history, tolerance of other cohorts has proven optimal in preserving our overall interests, sometimes our survival.  When one group views its beliefs and values as superior, and seeks to impose, or imposes, them on others, suffering ensues.

Often, members of a threatened cohort yearn for a Savior, a Messiah!  Socialist, Capitalist, Communist, or Fascist, people support a leader who pledges to ameliorate their plight.  Such a group may evolve into a Cult: exhibiting “great devotion to a person, idea, object, movement, or work.” (Merriam-Webster)

Cults range in size from Adolf Hitler’s millions to Marshall Applewhite’s 39 Heaven’s Gate disciples.  Their impacts include: millions of dead in World War II;  909 of Jim Jones’s People’s Temple devotees drinking cyanide-laced Flavor Aid; 82 members and 4 Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents dead in a fifteen-day standoff and subsequent conflagration with law enforcement at Vernon Wayne Howell’s, “David Koresh,” Branch Davidian compound.

The roots of cults motives are instructive.  In The True Believer (1951)longshoreman and social philosopher Eric Hoffer argues that, “mass movements arise to challenge the status quo  .  .  .  (and) the sense of individual identity and the holding to particular ideals that can lead to extremism and fanaticism among both leaders and followers.”* (My emphasis)

Two decades after Hoffer, in his Pulitzer Prize-winning nonfiction The Denial of Death (1973), anthropologist Ernest Becker “argues most human action is taken to ignore or avoid the inevitability of death.”*

Reflecting Becker’s premise, in The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life (2015) Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Psyzczynski postulate, “terror management theory” (TMT) were, in addition to religious beliefs, cultural values—including those that are seemingly unrelated to death—offer symbolic immortality.  For example, values of national identity, identity, posterity, cultural perspectives on sex, and human superiority over animals, have been liked to calming death concerns  .  .  .  symbolic immortality.”*

Without further belaboring or pretending to understand what I don’t, personal observations may prove instructive.  Sitting in a SE Portland parking lot, over maybe fifteen minutes I saw maybe two dozen shoppers entering or leaving Walmart.  Nine in ten was black, brown, or Asian.  A few days later, sitting in an Oregon City parking lot, over a similar amount of time, I saw a similar number of shoppers entering or leaving Safeway.  None was black, brown, or Asian.

In The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump, fearful of what I’m not first to label “the coloring of America,” a white woman pleaded,“I want my country back!”  Conservative, white, “Christian,” Americans desperately cling to their self-avowed Savior and Messiah, Donald J. Trump! 

*Wikipedia 

A Lazy Man’s Bike Tour

On or about the first day of summer, I completed a 3.5 to 4 year, 5649 mile, stationary bike tour from Oregon City to New York City, north to Canada, west to Vancouver B.C., and south to home.  Somewhere in Canada the gearshift gave out.  The last 1000 or so miles were on a new bike.

Now I’m on to Lincoln City and south on 101 to, who knows where? 

Trumpian Gaslighting

Former President Donald J. Trump insists the “Presidential Records Act” justifies his taking government documents from the White House to Mar-a-Lago.  The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 22 § 2202 states: “The United States shall reserve and maintain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.” (Merriam-Webster) (My emphasis.) What am I missing?  Am I losing it? 

Cursory consideration of Donald’s voluminous pronouncements and screeds make clear that whatever comes from his lips at a given moment serves his purpose in that moment.  For non-MAGA Minions, the maddening question is: Is the ex-President just shooting off his mouth here or, more frightening, crazy?  

No doubt Donald Trump believes the documents belong to him.  The conflict between this assertion and the Presidential Records Act may be viewed as, intentional or not, “gaslighting,” the “psychological manipulation of a person(s) .  .  .  that causes the person(s) to question the validity of their own thoughts, perceptions of reality, or memories and typically leads to confusion, loss of confidence and self-esteem, uncertainty of one’s emotional or mental stability, and a dependency on the perpetrator!  (Merriam-Webster) (My emphasis.) 

Whew!  I’m not losing it!